Thursday, January 24, 2013

A Digital Frontier

     Technology is constantly advancing around us. With e-books growing in popularity as well as the tablets they are viewed on, paperless seems to be the beneficial way to go; as it's marketed to be better for the planet with less trees being cut down. My generation was the first to grow up technologically savvy. When I was in elementary school, being that it was a private one my parents had to pay a high tuition in order for me to attend. With the money that was put into the school, there were several classroom programs that included the heavy use of computers to aid in teaching. In my mathematics classes, periodically we engaged in playing the game "Math Blaster". With the theme of space and battling to get the correct number and blasting the incorrect ones out of the way, needless to say it was a very popular game, especially among the males in my class. Moving into Middle School, there were similar themes. I was at a middle school for higher educated learning and with the decent budget, I also engaged in technologically attached classrooms. As I grew older, I became more aware of social networks and I participated in all of the popular ones such as Facebook, MySpace, Xanga, and others. Xanga served as my first blogging experience as I used it to constantly reflect and express myself as a young man. With Facebook and MySpace, I opened my eyes to the risky lifestyle that is social networking. 
     Upon reading Will Richardon's Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts, and Other Powerful Web Tools for Classrooms, I noticed that for seasoned teachers and professors, they feel that they lack in being as technologically savvy as their students. With that, there is a gap that exists. I have personally experienced this as the role of the student. I have had several teachers and professors who struggle to use technology in application to their curriculum. Although technology has advanced and school databases move into paperless structures, I found that regardless of educational establishments moving forward by installing these technologies into their respective areas, I feel there is still some negligence for teachers who are not technologically savvy. Despite this, I feel that this gap will close up as newer teachers from my generation will proceed to use technology as a resource in their classrooms.
     As a teacher-in-training, in the future I will absolutely install the usage of technology in my classroom, as a means of teaching, to post assignments, and to communicate with my students who may not want to do so face to face. In terms of teaching a second language, I feel very strongly about using technology as a very valuable resource. Today there are programs that exist such as the Rosetta Stone Language Program, the Pimsleur Learning Program and many other branches of language programs that rely on technology in order to reach to students all over the world. I intend to teach English abroad to elementary students between second to fourth grade so the standards for students of English as a Second Language, as described on the New York State Education Department website: http://www.p12.nysed.gov/biling/resource/ESL/03Elem.pdf include that of students demonstrating "cross-cultural knowledge and understanding" as well as learning to "listen, speak, read and write in English for classroom and social interaction." 
     Using a combination of curriculum that can be applied in the concrete classroom as well as the digital one, I believe that these standards can be accomplished. On education-friendly websites such as ePal and with the digital classroom set towards English language teaching, the student will learn how to demonstrate cross-cultural knowledge and understanding through the inclusion of culture in the curriculum. The combination of technology and concrete classroom teaching would provide more than enough for the standards of listening, speaking, reading and writing activities along with social interaction. As more students enroll into school, students as young as kindergarten consistently build up their technological skills. With more tablets being used as paperless bedtime stories for children, it is natural at this point that the incoming students are savvy with technology.
     Even though technology serves positively in teaching, as well as an enjoyable way for students to learn and express themselves, it must not be forgotten that a concrete classroom environment is also necessary to teach at times. In my future classrooms, I would like to implement a balanced blend between concrete and digital classrooms. As I grew up in the generation that looked to the digital frontier for many answers, I know the dangers of losing oneself and forgetting the concrete world. There are many positives and negatives to the digital world, as there is to the concrete one so with that, we, as future teachers and current teachers alike must look to balance these worlds in order to create a better environment for our students.

13 comments:

  1. A blended learning class of f2f and online learning sounds like a good option for L2 learners, especially younger ones.
    Have you had any personal experience with the Rosetta Stone or Pimsleur programs? I'm curious to know what methodologies they employ and how successful learners can be with the programs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have had personal experiences with both Rosetta Stone and the Pimsleur Method. With the Pimsleur Method, there are several "real-life scenarios" presented and it asks for the participation of the language learner in repeating words and sentences, as well as advising for listening to one lesson a day in order to receive the proper Pimsleur learning experience. With Pimsleur, I was able to increase my Korean learning and I was able to jump straight into 300-level Korean courses as an undergraduate at UB.
      With Rosetta Stone, there were more elaborate exercises and required more reading and writing as a opposed to speaking. Rosetta Stone is very helpful although I feel that it requires a great deal of patience as the lessons tend to be too repetitive in referencing prior lessons. Pimsleur, however, I have found to be very useful and its methods actually retain in the mind of the language learner. Both Rosetta Stone and Pimsleur have released several different language volumes. In recent years, among friends and acquaintances I have found that the Pimsleur method has become more popular and useful in comparison to Rosetta Stone.
      For language learners who seek to use programs that do not require payment, there is also a website called Memrise.com that I have also used for reading, writing and speaking. With Memrise and Pimsleur, I was able to increase my vocabulary in Korean and keep up in the 300-level course. With technology constantly changing, programs such as Pimsleur, Memrise, and Rosetta Stone allow language learners to learn in a wider variety of environments.

      Delete
    2. Thanks so much for your insights about both programs.
      Dr. Burgos

      Delete
  2. With technology being so fully integrated into almost every aspect of our daily lives, it is absolutely essential, as you mentioned, for teachers to make an effort to familiarize themselves with some of the options available. It's also important, however, to recognize that not all students and schools have the same resources, which could make it difficult to implement completely technology-based projects or activities in the classroom. I do think that technology--in particular, blogging and discussions boards--can provide opportunities for students who are not comfortable in a traditional classroom setting to participate more fully and get more appropriate feedback, which is important.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I absolutely agree and I was actually going to make that the main point of my post but I thought it would have been better to start off with that in a later post. My high school, although it had a computer science program, limited the computer use to our program and for a few other classrooms. When I entered in 2004, the computer resource rooms were to be used by everyone but after that year, it was only limited to the students of the Computer Science program. I think these technologies should be given to those who need it more.

      Delete
  3. I have to agree with Bethany, I work at an inner city high school and I would love to incorporate technology everyday but the resources are limited and every department has to share them! My school just received a grant for Verizon tablets and we were given about 80, which they divided up between teachers that attended the training. Each teacher was given 10 tablets. My response was "What am I going to do with 10 tablets when I have 25 students in a class?" I think that technology is great but along with using these resources you always need a back-up plan because as we all know - technology fails at times. It is always a guarantee when I do a web-quest or some other activity on the internet at least a few students have an issue or one of the lap tops stops working. Great first blog!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As I said above, I completely agree. I worked as a volunteer at the Brooklyn Public Library when I was in high school and the children from the nearby elementary school would come to use the computer resource rooms in order to do research or homework on the chance that they did not have the resources at school or at home. Although I thought that it was great thinking on the children's part, it would be nice if something could be done about the lack of technological resources in schools. I am from New York City and my high school graduating class only remembered our experience as being in a prison; even the senior hoodie design showed hands holding jail bars! In the near future, I'd like to see more public libraries with more technological resources available to those who do not have it on the chance that schools themselves cannot afford the resources. Education is a web that involves not only teachers, which I feel is something that many forget.

      Delete
  4. It's great pleasure to read your blog. Just like you, I will also pay much attention to the use of technology in my future classroom. Although there might be some difficulties to actually put it into practice for all my students in China, I will try my best to make my students like this new way of learning.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think it's our dream to work with technology in the classroom as much as possible but as others have mentioned, it's hard if the school funding isn't there. I like how you mentioned that blogs will help the students who don't like to participate face to face. I was one of those students who didn't like to participate face to face growing up in fear that my answer wouldn't sound right. I believe this is one of the best things about blogging.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was also one of the quieter students so it's always good when you're not alone. Thank you so much!

      Delete
  6. I really like your idea that using blog as way to motivate those shy students. Blog makes teaching interesting and language learning a chatting time! When I read your blogs I almost forget I am doing homework. It makes homework not a burden for students.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much for your compliment! Some blogs do help in terms of schoolwork if applied in a way that most students would find interesting.

      Delete